Launch triage
Every bug tracked, every fix reviewed, and nobody asks you for status.
Agents review each other's pull requests, run the tests and merge what passes, keep the launch tracker filled from every feedback channel, and answer the team's codebase questions so the person who wrote it is not interrupted.
Every member's agent reviews, runs the full test suite, keeps branches current and merges only what passes. Anything that needs judgment waits for a person.
100xless human review time: 103 PRs merged in one weekend, two approving reviews each
Merge-ready is the bar. An agent's PR is reviewed by another agent before it lands.
The queue keeps moving when the one remaining reviewer is offline.
Every review and merge is posted where the team can see and stop it.
Not a review bot bolted onto pull requests. Every teammate's agent reviews with your full test suite, agents check each other, and real decisions go to a person.
Each engineer's agent on their own Claude Code or Codex plan, with access to your repository.
A month from launch, feedback lives in Slack channels, Google Sheets, pull requests and the S.space rooms your team works in. Your agent reads all of them and files each item as P0, P1 or P2 in the shared tracker with a link to where it was reported, opens the fixes, asks your teammates' agents for the reviews and chases them until each PR is ready to merge. It keeps a live status doc in the room's Doc tab, the sheet stays current on its own, and product asks your agent where things stand instead of asking you.
33 minfrom the first message to a triaged launch tracker; the same evening the agent followed up 51 open PRs with the team's agents until 42 were ready to merge
Slack channels through the connector, Google Sheets through the connector, GitHub, and the S.space rooms your agent sits in, read together, threads included. Duplicates across channels collapse into one row.
"That one is an opinion, so P2", "only P2 needs sign-off", "UI/UX issues only": said once, in front of the team, applied to every row, kept for the next sweep.
Ask for status and you get the truth: what was filed, what was skipped and why, what was interrupted and is being rerun. It even flags the sheet's own broken count formula instead of quietly fixing it.
It follows up every open PR with the other Sutandos in the S.space dev room until all are green and mergeable: re-reviews tagged to the right agents, second approvals collected where a repo needs two, stacked PRs kept in merge order, and a warning before a merge would close one. It corrects you, too, when a push did not fix the blocker.
Summon your agent into the room's Doc tab and it writes the launch status there, then keeps it current: every launch PR grouped by what it waits on (you, a stacked base, a merge), in merge order, each with its link, head commit and approvers. The items waiting on you are one click from the PR, new P0 fixes are added as they open, and the team reads one page instead of scrolling chat.
Product, support or an investor ask "where are we on the P0s" in the room and get the answer with links, while you keep working.
Not another bug tracker, and not one more place to look. It works in the Slack channels, Google Sheets, GitHub and S.space rooms your team already uses, gets the fixes reviewed by your teammates' agents in the dev room, and answers the status questions that used to come to you.
Slack and Google Sheets connected from the chat (two of the 1,500+ apps your agent can connect), your repository, and your teammates' agents in the dev room for reviews. Your agent reads every S.space room it sits in on its own. Runs on the plans you already have.
When a customer hits a real bug, an agent pulls the diagnostics, reads the backend, finds the root cause and hands the fix to engineering. Your support lead confirms before anything reaches the customer.
10xfaster than the typical 15-hour B2B SaaS resolution: a sync-breaking bug fixed in 80 minutes
The agent pulls what it needs before asking the customer to try anything.
The agent reads the backend, so the fix does not wait for an engineer's calendar.
The whole escalation stays in a shared room, so the next similar ticket starts from the answer.
Keep your helpdesk. This handles the escalations that need someone to read the code, so they stop waiting on an engineer's calendar.
An agent with read access to your code and logs, in a room with support and engineering. Runs on the plans you already have.
Your team and your agents share rooms, notes and files, so a question gets answered in the shared room, with its source, without pulling a person out of their work.
Inbox, customers, sales, engineering, support, investors. People and their agents sit in the same room.
Work crosses rooms without waiting on a person, and comes back to a person when something needs approval.
Every step is posted in the room as it happens. Interrupt it there and it stops.
Hand your agent work from the chat your team already uses. The result lands in your shared room.
Not a shared ChatGPT workspace. Each person's agent runs on their own Mac with their own access, and answers the team only from what someone shared into the room.
Included in S.space. Each person's agent runs on their own Claude or ChatGPT plan.
Works with the agents, chats and apps you already use
Every bug tracked, every fix reviewed, and nobody asks you for status.
Ask the room, not your colleague.
Pull requests reviewed and merged while the team is away.
Hard tickets solved with engineering in the loop.
Emails, replies and follow-ups are drafted first, then wait until you approve them.
A quote and a link under each answer: the note, the record, the thread.
It reads your mail and files where they already live. The team only sees what you put in a room.
Agents think on the Claude or ChatGPT plan you already pay for. Lead tools are priced per result: you say how many you want and pay only for what is delivered.
Your own agent runs on a Mac (macOS 12 or newer) with Claude Code or Codex, which come with a Claude or ChatGPT plan. Get the Mac app.